AI Suggests
- Topic relevance by sector
- Stakeholder sentiment clustering
- IRO narrative drafts
- Framework mapping hints
Loading...
ESG Reporting SuiteMateriality that
Materiality that
stands up to scrutiny
CSRD requires double materiality โ impact and financial. Your spreadsheet can't prove the methodology. Our platform can.
Double Materiality Matrix
FY2025 ยท 10 ESRS Topics
Impact Material
Double Material
Monitor
Financial Material
Impact MaterialityE4E1S1E3E2G1E5S3S4S2Environmental
Social
Governance
The Problem
Spreadsheet materiality doesn't survive assurance
Most organisations still run double materiality in Excel with email-based stakeholder engagement. Auditors are rejecting it.
No methodology audit trail
Threshold decisions, scoring rationale, and stakeholder weighting locked in someone's head โ not in the system.
Disconnected stakeholder input
Surveys in one tool, analysis in another, results copy-pasted into the matrix. No traceability from input to outcome.
Static, point-in-time output
A PDF matrix that's outdated before it's published. No connection to the live risk register or ESG reporting.
How It Works
Two lenses. One assessment. Full audit trail.
CSRD demands you assess each sustainability topic from two directions: its impact on people and planet, and its financial effect on your enterprise. SustainGRC scores both axes per topic, places them on the matrix, and records every decision with linked evidence.
Impact Materiality
Scale, scope, and irremediability of your outward effects on people and environment.
Financial Materiality
Risks and opportunities that could materially affect your cash flows, access to finance, or cost of capital.
Quadrant Classification
Topics classified as Double Material, Impact Material, Financial Material, or Monitor โ with configurable thresholds.
Stakeholder Engagement
From consultation to evidence โ in one workflow
ESRS requires you to demonstrate how stakeholder input shaped your materiality assessment. We make that link auditable.
Map Groups
Classify stakeholders as affected parties or users of reports per ESRS categories. Track contact counts and engagement methods.
Record Interactions
Log every consultation โ surveys, focus groups, town halls, board workshops โ with sentiment tagging and topic linkage.
Trace Influence
Connect stakeholder feedback directly to topic scoring. AI clusters sentiment by theme, but humans confirm every adjustment.
Prove the Process
Assurance-ready documentation: who was engaged, when, how, and what changed as a result. Full separation of duties.
Framework Alignment
Assess once. Map to every framework.
Each IRO carries tags showing which frameworks it satisfies. Data is collected once and mapped to all applicable standards.
CSRD / ESRSFull alignment
GRI StandardsFull alignment
SAPFull alignment
ISSB S1 / S2Full alignment
GHG InventoryFull alignment
IntelexFull alignment
AI proposes. Humans confirm. System records both.
Our AI suggests sector-relevant topics and clusters stakeholder sentiment, but never sets scores or classifies materiality. Every governance decision requires human confirmation with linked evidence.
Humans Decide
- Impact & financial scoring
- Threshold configuration
- Classification overrides
- Board sign-off
System Proves
- Full audit trail
- Version snapshots
- Evidence chain
- Separation of duties
Connected Intelligence
Your materiality assessment feeds the entire platform
Topics classified as material automatically propagate to ESG Reporting, Risk Management, and Strategic Planning โ no re-entry required
ESG Reporting Suite
Material topics determine which disclosures are in scope. Classification changes update coverage automatically.
Enterprise Risk Management
Scope 1, 2, and 3 figures flow directly from the GHG Inventory module. No manual data transfer.
Strategic Planning
New regulation requirements auto-generate findings against your reporting configuration.
Why SustainGRC
Purpose-built. Not bolted on.
| Capability | SustainGRC | Point Tools |
|---|---|---|
| ESRS double materiality methodology | Partial | |
| IRO-level assessment (Impact, Risk, Opportunity) | ||
| Stakeholder engagement with topic linkage | ||
| Evidence lifecycle with separation of duties | ||
| Configurable thresholds and scoring bands | Manual | |
| Board-to-analyst governance workflow | Partial | |
| Cross-module propagation (Risk, Reporting) | ||
| AI-assisted topic and sentiment analysis | Partial | |
| Year-over-year comparison | ||
| LOCKED state immutability |
โWe moved from a 4-month Excel exercise to a 6-week auditable process. The stakeholder traceability alone justified the investment.โ
Head of Sustainability
FTSE 250 Financial Services ยท London